From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 13 08:22:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC52106564A for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:22:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe15.swip.net [212.247.155.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BFB8FC16 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=gg2W7PyvkLb8p4ie143lBA==:17 a=crCikxeKHFicBOKVKBMA:9 a=MbOCaF4-sel29xCYAjVL21rmldwA:4 Received: from [194.248.135.20] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop.adsl.tele2.no) by mailfe15.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.13) with ESMTPA id 532493476; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:22:27 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:22:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA1; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <4A559E50.3090408@bsdunix.ch> <1247179202.9053.39.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <4A5AEA66.6050207@bsdunix.ch> In-Reply-To: <4A5AEA66.6050207@bsdunix.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907131022.09180.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Ken Smith , Randi Harper , Thomas Vogt Subject: Re: USB stick installation problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:22:30 -0000 On Monday 13 July 2009 10:03:50 Thomas Vogt wrote: > > The server has 14 sata disk, controlled via lsi controller as /dev/daX > devices like the usb stick. Could this be a problem? This problem can easily be solved by mounting by label instead of device name. I have not checked the 8-current bootable image installation yet, but it appears that they are mounting /dev/da0sX instead of /dev/ufs/xxx typically. Maybe an idea for the release team to give a unique name or label to the partitions and mount according to that. Reference: Freesbie. --HPS