Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:34:59 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS-UP: Library version number bumps Message-ID: <20041001113459.GI83620@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040929171619.GC26065@saltmine.radix.net> References: <20040929030546.GE16305@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040929092710.GA59303@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040929123100.GA600@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <20040929135217.GA16594@saltmine.radix.net> <20040929164422.GA9262@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040929171619.GC26065@saltmine.radix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2004-Sep-29 13:16:19 -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: >_nc_tracebits is a variable, not a function. You can't "call" it. [Ignoring the specific issue since Thomas now agrees that _nc_tracebits is a function, not a variable]. You _can_ call a variable. It's just frowned upon. For an example, see http://www.ioccc.org/1984/mullender.c -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041001113459.GI83620>