From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 23:52:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A511065677 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99BE8FC0C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcbgb22 with SMTP id gb22so3450621vcb.13 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:52:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=UTN+ffPuSDcD/FpZCcjnsFlU0ckHVwyhzP388tirhq4=; b=TvPCVd/vhxa9LEGPHWpApOqmHXmvMK++Bn7bReMfYejOQw9ecN5smE6Pusy9ilC931 TBJOPBIAIcDxiv74uduF69gHWBgvTs1nmbWSgmRdonmuDJnurNQuQ/oGOXZjqfAZkQyN Uhm0xy8SHGiYypyAlAkIj6OMJSh1NP8IYCOlvMIvK1UafOvUvh8e6rCsisIJbOt+fYqF Z3gio9qEzrs+WMeR8/FtAz74+X0PBjF1IZqNaU7jzULCMclSdkN87G9+AcMhM5fjq7ah iOrLqA+sKpbLOxg8ddtMQVvfJswF8FOy9jwFWrfyoAXzUT5VW8O/R/E8dURlAEemOELI Gl/w== Received: by 10.52.20.138 with SMTP id n10mr3657291vde.129.1346370768213; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dyndns.org (c-24-63-226-98.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.63.226.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b15sm1090674vdt.7.2012.08.30.16.52.46 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:52:41 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Tim Gustafson Message-ID: <20120830195241.5795a3bd@kan.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: References: <951954369.1342002.1346354568372.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/6bcU4Zw=GH6N+IYTdlQp4z/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using AMD with NFS Mounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:52:50 -0000 --Sig_/6bcU4Zw=GH6N+IYTdlQp4z/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:54:12 -0700 Tim Gustafson wrote: > > Although I'd see it as an option initially, planning on supporting > > both "forever" would just result in bloat and yet more software to > > try and maintain, imho. (Theoretical comment, at least until a > > solid autofs port exists.) >=20 > I don't see that as a valid argument against adding an autofs port. > Should we drop the port for Exim or Postgres, because ports for > Sendmail and mySQL exist? >=20 No, we should not. But we should recognize that current VFS namecache architecture in FreeBSD makes autofs implementation very impractical without implementing full nullfs-like vnode stacking, and _that_ should be considered an argument against adding autofs port and for re-architecting namecache. We've been through this discussion many times before and all cards are marked in this game :) --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_/6bcU4Zw=GH6N+IYTdlQp4z/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFQP/zNQ6z1jMm+XZYRAjV1AJsHMXI56U+ymirZUcjc9Yw8dGizqACdG2bP SpV2NHG9gveJZoic/Vi8wJ4= =57cW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/6bcU4Zw=GH6N+IYTdlQp4z/--