From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 30 01:31:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA18384 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atropos.c2.org (atropos.c2.org [140.174.185.14]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA18376 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:31:06 -0700 (PDT) From: sameer@c2.org Received: (from sameer@localhost) by atropos.c2.org (8.7.4/CSUA) id BAA20958; Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604300831.BAA20958@atropos.c2.org> Subject: Re: Porting if_vif.c to FreeBSD 2.0.5... To: angio@aros.net (Dave Andersen) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 01:31:04 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199604300641.AAA26399@terra.aros.net> from "Dave Andersen" at Apr 30, 96 00:41:22 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > To wit: On a linux 1.2.13 with aliasing, the 130th alias takes ~3ms > longer to ping on a local ethernet than the interface address itself. > (4.5ms vs 1.5ms). I don't have enough aliases on the freebsd boxes to > test this (and they're 'production' so I'm not in the mood to play with > them. :), so I'm curious if someone's actually looked at it? > 2.1-STABLE: To the normal #: 0.448/0.609/4.698 To the 54th alias: 0.480/0.562/2.188 -- Sameer Parekh Voice: 510-601-9777x3 Community ConneXion, Inc. FAX: 510-601-9734 The Internet Privacy Provider Dialin: 510-658-6376 http://www.c2.net/ (or login as "guest") sameer@c2.net