From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Apr 23 15:10:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA06514 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:10:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from localhost.my.domain (ppp6443.on.bellglobal.com [206.172.208.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA06439; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 15:10:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA00261; Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:30:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ac199@hwcn.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tim owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 23 Apr 1998 17:30:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek X-Sender: tim@localhost Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/4183 In-Reply-To: <199804191805.LAA23016@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 19 Apr 1998, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Synopsis: How about upgrading bc to 1.04? > > State-Changed-From-To: open-suspended [...] > Great idea, now who does it ? Is it even worthwhile leaving these "suspended" instead of "closed"? -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message