From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sun Sep  8 21:39:35 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326AE3EF1
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  8 Sep 2019 21:39:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RPny1BDQz48vB
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Sep 2019 21:39:34 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions?
From: "@lbutlr" <kremels@kreme.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <ab684268f5a47d75ee638b017a4c0977.squirrel@webmail.gundo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 15:39:32 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43CF4581-E228-4A57-8DD7-2B953FA5A0B9@kreme.com>
References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com>
 <ab684268f5a47d75ee638b017a4c0977.squirrel@webmail.gundo.com>
To: ajtiM via freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RPny1BDQz48vB
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42
 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.985,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[];
 R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[];
 MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.976,0];
 IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ip: (-0.80), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.22), asn: 209(-0.04),
 country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[];
 HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:39:35 -0000

On 8 Sep 2019, at 15:12, Pau Amma <pauamma@gundo.com> wrote:
> On Sun, September 8, 2019 8:24 pm, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current =
patch
>> level is of a release?
>=20
> Assuming you mean "the highest patch level available for that =
version",
> not "the one I'm currently running": I believe this was discussed =
recently
> in IRC and the conclusion was "no, but there should be=E2=80=9D.


Definitely should be, yes.



--=20
Everything that was magical was just a way of describing the world in
words it couldn't ignore.