From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Mar 30 8:30:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from alms1.fw.att.com (alms1.att.com [192.128.167.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C8814CFD for ; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:30:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shalunov@att.com) Received: from tuzik.lz.att.com ([135.25.200.84]) by alms1.fw.att.com (AT&T/IPNS/GW-1.0) with ESMTP id LAA17507; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:30:01 -0500 (EST) Received: (from shalunov@localhost) by tuzik.lz.att.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id LAA04730; Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:32:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from shalunov@att.com) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:32:30 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903301632.LAA04730@tuzik.lz.att.com> X-Authentication-Warning: tuzik.lz.att.com: shalunov set sender to shalunov@att.com using -f From: stanislav shalunov To: bde@zeta.org.au Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199903300939.TAA07113@godzilla.zeta.org.au> (message from Bruce Evans on Tue, 30 Mar 1999 19:39:50 +1000) Subject: Re: kern/10545: When a fork/exec stress test is run, the machine locks up References: <199903300939.TAA07113@godzilla.zeta.org.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > From: Bruce Evans > In 4.0. I was just pointing out why testing under 4.0 may be misleading. Is any of the developers interested in chasing down this bug? Looks like it is serious (may mean remote denial of service with servers that fork/exec on each incoming connection, like inetd). -- stanislav shalunov@att.com 732-576-3252 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message