Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:23:37 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 220818] devel/oniguruma5: Fix multiple vulnerabilities in 5.9.6_p1
Message-ID:  <bug-220818-13-G2IRwBwjEF@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-220818-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-220818-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220818

--- Comment #9 from Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> ---
I have no idea.  My point is that the current situation is bad.

There should either be only one oniguruma port, or if there are more than o=
ne,
they should be able to live in harmony and not conflict.

It may be easier to have only one, yes.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-220818-13-G2IRwBwjEF>