From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 1 09:21:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA06446 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 1 May 1998 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA06437 for ; Fri, 1 May 1998 09:21:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA28772; Fri, 1 May 1998 09:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd028770; Fri May 1 16:07:23 1998 Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 09:01:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Warner Losh cc: KATO Takenori , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf Makefile.i386 src/sys/pc98/conf Makefile.pc98 In-Reply-To: <199805010442.WAA05011@harmony.village.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think it should be committed.. it's a correct step towards multi-architecture. On Thu, 30 Apr 1998, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <19980430194841D.kato@gneiss.eps.nagoya-u.ac.jp> KATO Takenori writes: > : The patch againt current config can be obtained from: > : > : http://www.freebsd.org/~kato/patches/config.diff > : > : The binary with above patch can generate both i386 and pc98 > : configuration files. > > Any reason that this patch shouldn't be part of the base FreeBSD > system? > > Warner > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message