From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 01:32:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6A816A4CE for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D026A43D2F for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:32:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iBG1WqX6032368; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:32:52 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 20:33:23 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Willem Jan Withagen In-Reply-To: <41C0D8F6.9080609@withagen.nl> Message-ID: <20041215202947.F9905@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20041212175907.L22745@zoraida.natserv.net> <41BCE0BF.40403@jrv.org><41C0D8F6.9080609@withagen.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: "James R. Van Artsdalen" cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Server motherboard recommendation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 01:32:54 -0000 On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > From my humble experience as an ISP: > Unless these are rather heavy loaded domains, with seriously large webpages > and/or people sending large amounts of mail, this could be amply serviced by > just anything above a 386 with 64mb :) Glad to read that. I do hope to grow the hosting part of my business and the last thing I want is to have to get another machine any time soon.. so leaning towards single Opteron. Was also considering to partner with someone.. so the dual boards would have been better if that happened. > Getting it in 1U with a seperate card requires somewhat more thought since > you'd want a video-chipset onboard to save on extra slots. The data center I am considering will let me put a desktop which will save some money on the case.