From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 15:47:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arm@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EFE16A400 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC0E13C448 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l59Fkhrv017261; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 09:46:43 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:47:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20070609.094708.-2034663768.imp@bsdimp.com> To: bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <51831.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181397815.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> References: <59832.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181391583.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> <20070609123941.GJ16463@cicely12.cicely.de> <51831.2001:6f8:101e:0:20e:cff:fe6d:6adb.1181397815.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0 (harmony.bsdimp.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 09 Jun 2007 09:46:44 -0600 (MDT) Cc: arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: if_ate handles the bytes of the MAC address in a "wrong" order X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:47:41 -0000 I think these patches are basically good. I gotta think about how I wanna roll these into the kernel as I have units in the field that upgrading their boot loader would be awkward... Why do you look at all four SA registers, but only pick the first non-zero one? Why is that going to he better than just looking at the first one? Until FreeBSD can support muliple MAC addresses, I'm not sure I see the point... Warner