From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 16 13:03:40 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967EFF65;
 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:03:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513862BD0;
 Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:03:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1VLYUp-000JdE-Du; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:05:43 +0400
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:05:43 +0400
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>
Subject: Re: jail configuration
Message-ID: <20130916130543.GA73887@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8661u2kppt.fsf@nine.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, jamie@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:03:40 -0000

On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:35:26PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:

> We've had jail.conf(5) for several years now, but no way to use it
> because the rc script doesn't support it.
> 
> It is not perfect, but it is much cleaner and much more powerful than
> the old way of setting variables in rc.conf.
> 
> I suggest that the attached patch (and the necessary changes to the
> documentation) is long overdue.

This break existing configuration, yes?
Can you adding (not replace) new way?