From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jan 27 19:23:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25DF37B402; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:23:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id C9E8C10DDF7; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:23:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:23:18 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Brian T. Schellenberger" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, knu@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports superceding others? Message-ID: <20020127192318.P13686@elvis.mu.org> References: <20020127185809.O13686@elvis.mu.org> <20020128030530.4232A401E@i8k.babbleon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020128030530.4232A401E@i8k.babbleon.org>; from bts@babbleon.org on Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 10:05:30PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Brian T. Schellenberger [020127 19:07] wrote: > On Sunday 27 January 2002 09:58 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > I find it somewhat annoying that although I've installed XFree86-4 > > a lot of ports want imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries built on thier > > own. > > > > Isn't there some way of marking XFree86-4 as a superset of all > > the mini x11 ports? > > Do you have > > XFREE86_VERSION= 4 > > in > > /etc/make.conf ? > > Just a theory . . . Yes I do. However I failed to mention that this is really a problem with portupgrade/pkgdb -F. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductable donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message