Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:56:58 -0701
From:      Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com>
To:        Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca>
Cc:        Sergey Babkin <babkin@bellatlantic.net>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Improving GNU make compatibility in BSD make (+ patch)
Message-ID:  <20020603045720.GG11452@lizzy.catnook.com>
In-Reply-To: <200206030439.g534d2m1029139@orthanc.ab.ca>
References:  <20020603024004.GC11452@lizzy.catnook.com> <200206030439.g534d2m1029139@orthanc.ab.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:39:02PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> >>>>> "Jos" == Jos Backus <jos@catnook.com> writes:
> 
>     >> Writing portable makefiles is already enough of a pain in the
>     >> ass.
>     Jos> Writing Makefiles is a pain, period.
> 
> Writing makefiles is easy. Writing *portable* makefiles is a pain.
> There *is* a difference.

I agree with the portable part.
For small projects, Makefiles are fine imo.

-- 
Jos Backus                 _/  _/_/_/        Santa Clara, CA
                          _/  _/   _/
                         _/  _/_/_/             
                    _/  _/  _/    _/
jos@catnook.com     _/_/   _/_/_/            use Std::Disclaimer;

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020603045720.GG11452>