Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 04:18:24 +1200 From: Andrew McNaughton <andrew@squiz.co.nz> To: marker@uswest.net Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xinetd vs. tcp_wrappers Message-ID: <199903261618.EAA16015@aniwa.sky> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Mar 1999 14:40:13 CST." <19990325204041.951BF15371@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
marker@trolldom.oss.uswest.net said: > My understanding is that xinetd is meant to be a complete replacement > for the inetd/tcp_wrappers bunndle. As such, it is expected to have > the functionality of both. I have, however, been unable to get xinetd > to > > 1) send me mail when someone touches my machines in a > way i've not said is ok, Supposing someone is sniffing your network, and you are reading your mail from another machine, does this mail give away any otherwise unknown information about the configuration of the machine? Andrew McNaughton -- ----------- Andrew McNaughton andrew@squiz.co.nz http://www.newsroom.co.nz/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903261618.EAA16015>