From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 28 16:07:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C988A9E; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-da0-f54.google.com (mail-da0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645078FC0A; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z9so2104692dad.13 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:07:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dp2kNYDl+RQcsbWcl5AMjbdILHS2hiv5iKY6HiKsvDk=; b=F/zDjIxkrp7Ra+Ym8gD3/CZG+KIISCM6OL3T1PLL0OhtuwNUesid9yZEgu/mV/11mA kDTc4DynJObkd8kTqfG8x2HEQyliDKE9Nd8sAz+GEFcaKzJrpZL3FUUHBeO0w1WgEPbO 5u+b/+3YpgupOVAAPZ7JGroYPWnmbDXVw/GHBqg7cjF6rw9/MeGQxMEbe18PLnX/FZ+m znSUPCvovSEXcws8cz2V4aY0BH6P7G8qysbYIC/gYQSJyOPA3dGU+J142tgLxHPnRIFk p/WWQa+0aFzoqwCZufcl/JDYbUXG0E0TUTuxAPxfyxNoqM6jjQayy4vlmugizrdcDRZ8 pxhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.218.226 with SMTP id pj2mr86538087pbc.33.1351440444845; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.146.233 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:07:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <508D0F11.1060203@kovesdan.org> References: <508D0F11.1060203@kovesdan.org> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:07:24 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sYs1RHleJuT0B3EbuBXTyc0D6b8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Porting patch(1) from NetBSD to FreeBSD (was Re: FreeBSD in Google Code-In 2012? You can help too!) From: Adrian Chadd To: Gabor Kovesdan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Pedro Giffuni , hiren panchasara X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:07:25 -0000 On 28 October 2012 03:55, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Hi Hiren, > > good to hear that someone is working on this! However, porting these > utilies is much tougher than it apparently seems. There are much more > criteria than just it compiles and works. More specifically, you should > make sure that: [snip] * It's totally bug compatible for now with gnu patch/diff. * You write a _lot_ of test cases for the test framework, so people can do automated regression testing on both performance and behaviour. It'd be nice to have more regression testing. :-) Adrian