From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 16:30:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E6A1065673 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from triosoft@triosoft.com.ua) Received: from lambent.informjust.ua (lambent.informjust.ua [193.111.173.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1551A8FC23 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from status.informjust.ua ([10.1.10.202]) by lambent.informjust.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id LDJ3AI-0007OU-6A for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:03:55 +0200 Received: from [10.2.113.5] (helo=zk.informjust.ua) by status.informjust.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGIt-000J3v-1N for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:03:39 +0200 Received: from monstro.zk.informjust.ua ([10.2.113.96]) by zk.informjust.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PTGIu-0008DB-Ns for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:03:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4D0A38A3.1020108@triosoft.com.ua> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:04:51 +0200 From: "Alexander V. Ribchansky" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20101016 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20101213214556.GC2038@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20101213214556.GC2038@garage.freebsd.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "lambent.informjust.ua", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see root@localhost for details. Content preview: First of all, thank pjd@, mm@ and others who made zfs go ahead in FreeBSD! You are absolutely monsters! Now one question, what I do wrong, that I can't use /boot/zfsboot to boot MBR+zfs-only FreeBSD? More info. If I use /boot/zfsboot form recent STABLE (from snapshot CD or built myself) to boot up this [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) Subject: Re: Next ZFSv28 patchset ready for testing. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:30:28 -0000 First of all, thank pjd@, mm@ and others who made zfs go ahead in FreeBSD! You are absolutely monsters! Now one question, what I do wrong, that I can't use /boot/zfsboot to boot MBR+zfs-only FreeBSD? More info. If I use /boot/zfsboot form recent STABLE (from snapshot CD or built myself) to boot up this monstro# gpart show ad6 => 63 625142385 ad6 MBR (298G) 63 104872257 1 ntfs [active] (50G) 104872320 520270128 2 freebsd (248G) monstro# gpart show ad6s2 => 0 520270128 ad6s2 BSD (248G) 0 516075824 1 freebsd-zfs (246G) 516075824 4194304 2 freebsd-swap (2.0G) I install /boot/zfsboot as dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ad6s2 count=1 dd if=/boot/zfsboot of=/dev/ad6s2a skip=1 seek=1024 when I reboot, system stuck in "-" or "\" or "/" or finaly "|" prompt. when I install /boot/zfsboot from recent 9-CURRENT snapshot CD all boots-up perfectly. More over, fresh built /boot/zfsboot from v28 pachset either from 8-S or 9-C patches stuck as I describe above. What I miss? Can somebody send me known to work copy of /boot/zfsboot from v28 patchset? Thanks! -- WBR, Alexander V. Ribchansky AVR39-RIPE