Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:08:43 -0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: vbox@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234878] emulators/virtualbox-ose: Update to 6.0 Message-ID: <bug-234878-26505-IvctmBhfH3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-234878-26505@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-234878-26505@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234878 --- Comment #32 from BonHomme <n.ospam@poboxes.eu> --- (In reply to VVD from comment #31) Come on. Be a little bit practical please.=20 How many people really need to reach Virtualbox from more than one or two machines? Beside that, once you installed Remotebox on the client and Freeb= sd, installing the next client is just a matter of a few minutes. Using phpvirtualbox or remotebox is just a matter of choice and what is most important to you as the Virtualbox funtionality in both solutions is the sa= me. Only the access method is different. And for people that work with an unsupported platform nothing changes. They have to wait for phpvirtualbox anyway. So as remotebox is an excellent, very well working and very well maintained= =20 alternative to phpvirtualbox (remotebox supports V6 already since January 6 2019) I really don't understand why everybody using virtualbox must wait (m= ore than 8 months) for phpvirtualbox to be ready. And as far as using an (untested?) and unsupported patch for Vbox 6: Are y= =C3=B3u serious? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-234878-26505-IvctmBhfH3>