From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 19:01:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164B09B64A3 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (kientzle.com [142.254.26.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31D91D45; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id t78J2IVS005577; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:02:18 GMT (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (192.168.1.101 [192.168.1.101]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id u4natxfn3gyhawavbx9ta53y8s; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:02:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Subject: Re: Crochet Updates for RPi, BeagleBone From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: <1439058129.70393.262.camel@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:01:55 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8C0A45D4-38F0-4099-84AE-D904B8614604@kientzle.com> References: <486955D9-6EED-47E4-BCAA-AA66650BB9DA@kientzle.com> <55C3EA7E.7050905@blarg.com> <85E89B54-B2AA-4D87-BA80-5BD2956B2F8A@kientzle.com> <1439058129.70393.262.camel@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:01:57 -0000 > On Aug 8, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Ian Lepore wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 10:52 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>> On Aug 6, 2015, at 4:15 PM, kah42pub wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 7/19/15 18:39, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>>> I just committed changes to Crochet so that it now uses the U-Boot = ports for RPi and BeagleBone (including BBB). It already used the port = for RPi2. >>>=20 >>> Has anyone successfully built the u-boot-rpi port recently for = RPI-B? >>=20 >> I just tried building each U-Boot port with an upgraded -CURRENT = system (including packages). Looks like anything based on U-Boot older = than 2015.04 is broken: >>=20 >> The following did not build for me: >> u-boot-beaglebone (uses U-Boot 2014.10) >> u-boot-cubox-hummingbird (based on U-Boot 2013.10) >> u-boot-duovero (based on U-Boot 2014.10) >> u-boot-pandaboard (uses U-Boot 2014.10) >> u-boot-rpi (based on U-Boot 2013.01) >> u-boot-wandboard (based on U-Boot 2013.10) >>=20 >> These did build: >> u-boot-bananapi (uses U-Boot 2015.04) >> u-boot-cubieboard (uses U-Boot 2015.04) >> u-boot-cubieboard2 (uses U-Boot 2015.04) >> u-boot-rpi2 (uses U-boot 2015.04) >=20 > The cross-compiler port used for u-boot got upgraded behind our backs = to > gcc5, and that breaks all the u-boots that are based on older > vendor-supplied sources. I have a new arm-none-eabi-gcc492 port ready > to go, but I'm not a ports committer, so I'm waiting for someone to > review and approve the commit. Great! Keeping old GCC versions available in the ports tree sounds like a good plan in general. > I also plan to try and get as many of our u-boot ports as possible > updated to the latest mainline u-boot sources, but I still want to get > the gcc492 port in first because I think updating to mainline u-boot = is > more than a day or two of work. Thanks for your work on this. Cheers, Tim