From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 13 12:00:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE91216A424 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amon@sockar.homeip.net) Received: from sockar.homeip.net (tourist.net8.nerim.net [213.41.176.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEBE43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:00:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amon@sockar.homeip.net) Received: from sockar.homeip.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sockar.homeip.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2DBq50E027632; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:52:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from amon@sockar.homeip.net) Received: (from amon@localhost) by sockar.homeip.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k2DBq5xV027631; Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:52:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from amon) Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:52:05 +0100 From: Herve Boulouis To: JoaoBR Message-ID: <20060313115205.GA17399@ra.aabs> References: <60F1B0FC76F1504A91839905DA7EBDB603903C@ssuzexmb3.amd.com> <2fd864e0603130256l52f5b0aoa5e2a4c720aa3e10@mail.gmail.com> <2fd864e0603130300m12a02932tb82c3c5fa4ac1973@mail.gmail.com> <200603130823.35433.joao@matik.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200603130823.35433.joao@matik.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: NUMA and Dual-Core Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 12:00:30 -0000 Le 13/03/2006 08:23, JoaoBR a écrit: > > Is the memory access with dual-core (not HT) the the same as with > dual-processores? Would NUMA have any impact on dual-cores? Since the memory controller is shared between the 2 cores on dual core opterons, I doubt you'll see any benefits on memory accesses with a NUMA aware scheduler. -- Herve Boulouis