From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 30 18:50:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAC616A4CE for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690E643D49 for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 18:50:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4V1oJZs008673 for ; Sun, 30 May 2004 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4V1oJG4008670; Sun, 30 May 2004 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405310150.i4V1oJG4008670@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Michael Nottebrock Subject: Re: ports/63282: [NEW PORT] x11-toolkits/gtk-qt-engine X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Nottebrock List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 01:50:22 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/63282; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, danny@ricin.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/63282: [NEW PORT] x11-toolkits/gtk-qt-engine Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 03:45:34 +0200 Danny: There's no way this port could have ever compiled with gcc295, not in FreeBSD 5.x or elsewhere. I have hacked it into compiling by moving the failing declarations, since you already contacted the author before, you might want to forward files/patch-qt_theme_draw.c to him for reference (the additional include is not necessary). Thierry: Don't use USE_GCC=3.x for anything which links against anything C++. gcc 2.x and gcc 3.x have incompatible ABI for binaries compiled from C++ code and since this engine links against Qt, this port was effectivly committed broken on -STABLE (but should be fixed now).