From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 2 17:50:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BFA16A407; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F19743D4C; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 17:50:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k92HocGZ018067; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:50:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Robert Watson Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:37:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <200609291618.09492.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060929235459.M73166@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20060929235459.M73166@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200610021337.30516.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:50:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/1973/Mon Oct 2 11:18:33 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:50:46 -0000 On Friday 29 September 2006 18:55, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, John Baldwin wrote: > > >>>> Btw, this is a topic that is easily searched on, as it gets brought up > >>>> fairly regularly. We were a bit late on the schedule this time, though, > >>>> so thanks for giving it a kickstart. > >>> > >>> We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. > > Only > >>> cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and > > ufs > >>> alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra > > isofs > >>> directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. > >>> > >> > >> What about moving all of the net* directories into /sys/net?. And don't > >> forget putting i386 and friends into /sys/arch! Ah, I love the smell of > >> fresh paint in the morning. Smells like.... napalm. > > > > Baby steps aren't hard. :) Back when I first made rumblings about this sort > > of thing we didn't have a sys/fs at all, but now we do and over time we've > > actually moved most of our filesystems into it. :) > > The great thing about moving all the network subtrees around is how we can > break the compile of all the existing applications that include net/*, > netinet/*, netinet6/*, etc, all in one pass. :-) Yes. :( That's actually the biggest reason to not move net* IMO. -- John Baldwin