Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:51:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org> To: "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: true aliased interface? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241248430.24335-100000@snafu.adept.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241019050.43945-100000@pogo.caustic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, f.johan.beisser wrote: > fxp0 flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu=1500 > inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > fxp0.1 flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu=1500 > inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.255 > etc... Hmm... like cisco subifs. What would this accomplish? The traffic is still going over the same physical interface... so is the subif desire for cosmetic purposes, or is there some performance aspect in mind? -mrh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241248430.24335-100000>