Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:03:20 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: dan@langille.org, software@kew.com (Drew Derbyshire), chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Postfix and Majordomo security (was FreeBSD Ports Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-01:INSERT_NUMBER_HERE) Message-ID: <200102120403.f1C43KU44936@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200102120338.UAA18276@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > Depends on whether you want to have certain lists go to a folder even if > > you happened to get it first via a direct personal cc: instead of via the > > main list. This is very handy for lists that grow extended cc: lists. > > > > eg: something that has any reference to chat@freebsd.org in the To:/Cc: > > headers always goes in my chat folder, even if I got it directly. > > msgid.cache catches the duplicates, but I dont want *anything* chat related > > in my inbox. A Bcc: chat would escape that. :-) > > So would rewriting the "To:" header to point to the list(s), and > putting all non-list members in the original "To:" and "Cc:" on > a rewritten "Cc:". > > Personally, I think that header rewriting is evil, even if it > is perfectly RFC compliant to do it, but it would certainly fix > your complaint. No, it wouldn't. It would make the remaining spam harder to detect. That was the point. The procmail thing was a side track. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102120403.f1C43KU44936>