From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 3 12:35:54 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id MAA26605 for current-outgoing; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 12:35:54 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA26599 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 12:35:52 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA00734; Sun, 3 Sep 1995 12:35:46 -0700 To: "Garrett A. Wollman" cc: current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: lynx in /usr/src/usr.bin/lynx; any objections? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 03 Sep 1995 14:31:03 EDT." <9509031831.AA16269@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 12:35:45 -0700 Message-ID: <732.810156945@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Any strong objections? Any strong agreement? > > Hmmm. I feel somewhat uncomfortable with this idea, but I don't know > if I can explain it to someone else. Well, I can actually sort of understand this so let me perhaps phrase it differently: Given that: A) HTML is very likely to become the documentation format of choice in the next 3 years. B) One should always be able to read the system's documentation using the base tools provided with that system. What would you recommend? I don't think that (B) is that contraversal a point - what would Windows be without WinHelp, or OS/2 without the IBM help facility? We should likewise be able to read our own documentation in some format that provides for the reasonable following of links, making bookmarks, etc. I would also say that our inclusion of GNU info establishes some precedent for this. If not lynx, then...? Jordan