From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 29 13:13:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA74516A4D0
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:13:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E5DB43D49
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:13:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <ab33924@salmon>; 29 Jun 2004 14:13:38 +0100 (BST)
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Request-Do: 
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:13:38 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <200406291413.ab33924@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Subject: RANDOM_IP_ID sysctl?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:13:40 -0000

It seems to me that RANDOM_IP_ID might be better as a sysctl rather
than a kernel option. Would anyone mind if I changed this?

	David.