From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 22 16:00:47 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA12491 for current-outgoing; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 16:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA12477 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 16:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA08708; Tue, 22 Oct 1996 15:58:06 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199610222258.PAA08708@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Possibility? To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Date: Tue, 22 Oct 1996 15:58:05 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199610222024.WAA19332@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 22, 96 10:24:51 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > sd1 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: SCSI2 0/direct removable > > sd1: sd1(ncr0:1:0): FAST SCSI-2 100ns (10 Mb/sec) offset 8. > > 1021MB, 1021 cyl, 64 head, 32 sec, 512 bytes/sec > > Ah, i thought it has two disks and four heads? It has a fictitious geometry. It can be used by DOS, remember, just like other SCSO devices. Luckily log2(4) does not result in a fractional component, so no space is lost. > > This doesn't keep it from working, it just pisses me off a bit. The > > fix is obvious from a casual examination of the OpenBSD SCSI code. > > Hmm, if you've already done it, why don't you post the diff here? I've casually examined the code differences, and noted the change. I haven't patched my FreeBSD because, frankly, I can't mount the OpenBSD disk to have both files up at once because of the disklabel differences (which are gratuitous, as far as I can tell). Further, it's not worth carrying in my tape drive with my broken back to do a tape transfer (it weighs more than a phonebook, my medically advised lifting limit), and I don't have the space on my FreeBSD disks nor want to waste the time for a 4 hour anoncvs download of the OpenBSD tree to my FreeBSD disks. Anyway, the core team is supposed to consider BSD4.4 source bases other than FreeBSD and incorporate useful changes without my help. I have enough problems keeping my own patches up to date against -current and keeping my porting bases up to date minus the i386 machine dependencies of -current. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.