Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:20:27 -0700
From:      Matt Rechkemmer <tiberius@trancell.org>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Dumb question about ports/packages
Message-ID:  <20050211072027.GA29449@sdf.lonestar.org>
In-Reply-To: <44acqfcdqk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <20050208085748.GA13424@sdf.lonestar.org> <200502080907.j1897gdL071181@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <44acqfcdqk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> 
> Um, no, as the original poster pointed out, ssh is part of the base
> system, and normally you don't need the port.  
> 
> Upgrading the base system *is* the best approach.  It *doesn't*
> normally require updating to the latest release; 4.10, for example, is
> still a supported branch, and will be for (at least) another year or
> so.  Updating to the latest of the 4.10 branch will do fine for this
> kind of problem.

These are probably RTFM questions, but I didn't seem to find a mention of the
base system packages in the UPGRADING document.  So how would one update a
base package, check it out of CVS and just compile/install like normal?

Should upgrading the entire system become a necessity (say 4.10 to 4.11),
would a reboot be *absolutely* necessary? 

Final question :-), is there anyway to determine if a base package is out of
date? Or is just wise to leave the base alone and upgrade when a new release
comes along.

Many thanks,

--
Matt Rechkemmer
tiberius@trancell.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050211072027.GA29449>