From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 7 00:42:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5359106564A; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 00:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onyx.glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:c200::face]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915968FC0C; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 00:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glenbarber.us (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:8:1205:2:2:0:100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by onyx.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 200BA23F645; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:42:33 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20120907004233.GG1332@glenbarber.us> References: <20120906195706.GD1332@glenbarber.us> <50491DB2.1020702@FreeBSD.org> <20120906221036.GF1332@glenbarber.us> <5049338F.5060702@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gJNQRAHI5jiYqw2y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5049338F.5060702@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow use of program path overrides X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:42:40 -0000 --gJNQRAHI5jiYqw2y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:36:47PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > >>> However, some are missing the functionality to override $command=20 > >>> correctly. > >> > >> rc.subr should already do that. Have you tested it? > >> > >=20 > > Yes. See the previous thread on -rc@ . >=20 > David never mentioned that he actually tested it, and just confirmed > that he didn't. Did you actually test it? >=20 *sigh*... Yes, and when I tested, it did not work for me. And, of course, it does now... So, what did I change originally in rc.conf? Unfortunately, I do not know, because I do not have the modified rc.conf... Sorry for the noise... Glen --gJNQRAHI5jiYqw2y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQSUL5AAoJEFJPDDeguUajwtwH/1RJRZIHLnIwjYF2aimlHTng 2uDc7Rct0N69DPyCB2DhHIto+gSvtA2joAPex2NrqB6vuY3Wh134lpKZ2BXOBP5t Zh4xjGiY0mw84Hytkcc/liiKWt1SrezpFOLoxp24DxEUkU+qi0sIekhu27mBxxmb vXZwjkM9Jniq12vIik1cqQWL6RX6p4lQsC6d8FDK7nnibUuiuPUSJ12WDwoITNqt 6ocK5s9ekJ6GLeQX+ZuajtvYOh8xBuTSX8Nxf/ShJpyPGR6SY0gy0CeiANavZMYf 8lZeP0YmPX6KJ6VG9rvqx4HTE6c28jyAUlZNhjVpYY2/lGPY7FiPCGV3djsx2R4= =eS0s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gJNQRAHI5jiYqw2y--