From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 14 5:17:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blues.ghis.net (pppc2-118.eisa.net.au [203.166.251.238]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602114BCD; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 05:17:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jim@blues.ghis.net) Received: (from jim@localhost) by blues.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA05469; Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:17:25 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jim) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 22:17:23 +1000 From: Jim Mock To: "David O'Brien" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xchat & xchat-devel? Message-ID: <19990714221723.D5365@blues.ghis.net> Reply-To: jim@blues.ghis.net References: <19990712132238.A36959@blues.ghis.net> <19990712010458.B57377@dragon.nuxi.com> <19990712181355.B55317@blues.ghis.net> <199907120822.BAA68238@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <19990712183933.A64188@blues.ghis.net> <19990712100441.B71904@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i In-Reply-To: <19990712100441.B71904@dragon.nuxi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 at 10:04:42 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > I don't know that it'll replace the current xchat port.. I mean, > > when it gets to 1.1.10, 1.2.0 will probably become the stable > > version, and 1.3.x the development tree (if they use their current > > version numbering). Am I making sense with any of this? > > > I ask again. > > Do we really need two xchat ports? Is the development version > stable in your experience? Stable enough to use. I don't normally use it, but my wife does, and I would've heard about it if it was crashing on her ;-) > Are there fundamental changes in the development version that once > it is released, some people will want to stick with the previous > version (perhaps forever)? Depends on whether or not they want the Native Language Support. It's been broken in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 so far in the development tree. The development versions compile fine without it. I guess what it comes down to is whether or not people want the NLS available or not. > Do people really need to be running the development version (in an > easy to install port manner)? Does the development version fix > bugs/problems with the currently released version? > > If not, then I would suggest either leaving the current xchat port > we have as is, or upgrading it to the development version (because > it is stable in your opinion) and just let people use that. MANY of > us are becoming to hate the proliferage of -devel ports bloat. Fair enough.. I was just thinking of those who use the NLS. I think we can just keep the current xchat port as is, and I'll keep sending diffs to keep that one current. If the NLS works in newer versions I'll re-enable in the port Makefile. Everyone agree that's what we should do? If I don't hear any objections within the next day or so, I'll send the diffs to upgrade the existing port to 1.1.2. Later, -- - Jim Mock - jim@blues.ghis.net - systems administrator - ghis.NET - - work: http://www.ghis.net/ - personal: http://www.ghis.net/~jim/ - - FreeBSD 'zine: http://www.freebsdzine.org/ - jim@freebsdzine.org - - FreeBSD: http://advocacy.freebsd.org/ - jim@advocacy.FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message