Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 12:37:47 +0900 From: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> To: Panos GEVROS <P.Gevros@cs.ucl.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inria ipv6 and ATM Message-ID: <199905120337.MAA11542@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 May 1999 21:37:58 %2B0200." <7896.926455078@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
INRIA IPv6 has its own extension to the en atm driver so that it leaves out the ALTQ extention (shadow interface) in the en driver. The INRIA atm driver does not have shaper control last time I checked. (KAME IPv6 comes with the ALTQ atm driver.) By the way, I backed out a shadow interface support from the official FreeBSD trees (both -stable and -current) for those who have their own extensions. In the next ALTQ release (scheduled by the end of May), the atm driver is reworked: - BPF works on each point-to-point VC (taken from the CAIRN atm driver) - queueing works on each point-to-point VC - no change in the userland tools --Kenjiro Panos GEVROS said: >> Hello, >> i was wondering whether anyone used the en ATM driver (as it comes with the >> ALTQ-1.1.3 distribution) on 2.2.8R and INRIA's IPv6. >> interfaces are recognized and configured ok. >> but is there a tool to set rate limit. >> (i'm trying to use ALTQ pvcsif pvctxctl utilities for the shadow i/faces on a >> 228-ALTQ113-INRIAIPv6 system without success so far) >> any ideas what might be wrong? >> Thanks >> Panos >> kirki# pvcsif en0 -s >> pvcsif: SIOCSPVCSIF: Invalid argument To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905120337.MAA11542>