From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Feb  9 19:10:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA08396
          for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dima@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA08369
          Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199602100310.TAA08369@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org?
To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh)
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 19:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199602091752.KAA23449@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Feb 9, 96 10:52:46 am
From: dima@FreeBSD.org (Dima Ruban)
X-Class: Fast
Organization: HackerDome
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Warner Losh writes:
> 
> : Hows about running E-bones there?
> : It allows rcp/rlogin/telnet without security risk.
> : I know about SSH, but Kerberos looks as more standard way to do it.
> 
> And more stable :-)
> 
> We're running the Cygnus Kerberos, so I can't comment on ebones.
> Looks like the same stuff...

Is eBones compatible with KerberosIV? I mean, I have kerberos on 
some of my computers, and I've heard encryption (or something else) isn't
compatible beetween kerberos and ebones. So, basically the question is:
will I be able to use eBones/kerberos encryption if I go from
kerberos machine to eBones server?

> 
> Warner
> 

-- dima