From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 2 11:30:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561A716A4CF for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:30:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200D543D2D for ; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 11:30:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B9UNB-0002jf-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:30:37 +0200 Received: from [217.83.8.90] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1B9UNA-00022t-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 21:30:37 +0200 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 21:31:19 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040402073338.26179.qmail@flock1.newmail.ru> <200404021751.i32Hpeud071280@chuck.bsdjpp.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <200404021751.i32Hpeud071280@chuck.bsdjpp.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404022131.21654.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e28873fbe4dbe612ce62ab869898ff08 cc: igorpopov@newmail.ru Subject: Re: natd and tun X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:30:38 -0000 On Friday 02 April 2004 17:51, Jean-Pierre PARISY wrote: > On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:33:37 +0400, ????? ????? ?????????? wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a question: would be natd work with tun device? I had already > > asked this question when FreeBSD 5.2 were released > > Someone have answered to me that I should use ppp builtin nat, because > > divert sockets doesn't work with tun. Simple rules like this > > divert all from any to any via tun0 > > allow all from any to any > > did not work. > > I'm sure that this works: > > # Divert all packets through the tunnel interface. > /sbin/ipfw add 100 divert natd all from any to any via tun0 Note that libalias was broken for a short time. See: Message-Id: <200404021757.i32Hvv6R058197@repoman.freebsd.org> or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libalias/alias.c#rev1.42 -- Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet