From owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 12:14:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D1616A4CF for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:14:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0826943D31 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:14:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stevan.tiefert@arcor.de) Received: from [194.97.55.191] (helo=mx7.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1CMmh4-0000Nf-8P for freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:14:22 +0200 Received: from pd9f7ecc7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.247.236.199] helo=arcor.de) 4.42 #1) id 1CMmh3-0006jL-R7 for freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:14:22 +0200 Message-ID: <417F90AD.9080801@arcor.de> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:12:29 +0200 From: Stevan Tiefert User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-at, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Decision to csh X-BeenThere: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Gathering place for new users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:14:24 -0000 Hello mailing-list, which philosophy is behind the decision to use csh for root an not sh like the other users? I mean that the root has to manage the configuration-scripts written in the language of sh not of csh. The difference of the script-languages between csh and sh are tremendous, isn't it? With regards Stevan Tiefert