From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon May 22 23: 0:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B389437BAF8 for ; Mon, 22 May 2000 23:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id XAA62834; Mon, 22 May 2000 23:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 23:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200005230600.XAA62834@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Kevin Day Subject: kern/10507 Reply-To: Kevin Day Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/10507; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kevin Day To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: kern/10507 Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 00:52:59 -0500 (CDT) I also saw similar behavior when using libefence with the option 'EF_PROTECT_FREE', in 3.2. This no longer occurs in 4.0 to the best of my testing ability. (I'm assuming they're the same issue). -- Kevin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message