Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:37:02 +0200 From: Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: # Reply-to. (was freebsdcon and Radisson ....) Message-ID: <4.1.19990914213152.00980d00@194.184.65.4> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909141111400.41770-100000@zone.unixshell.co m> References: <xzp7lltzho5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 14/09/99, Cliff Crawford wrote:
>On 14 Sep 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
>| "Reply-To" in connection with mailing lists has been discussed to
>| death in various fora. It's a semi-religious issue, though it is my
>| impression that most people who have actual experience managing
>| mailing lists ("actual experience" as opposed to "strong opinions
>| based on what one thinks managing a large mailing list may be like")
>| are against it. That includes me.
>
>Oh, well that explains it then--I've only run *small* mailing lists (~10
>members) and I love Reply-to. :)
I love it too in my mailing lists...
If reply-to is set probably I could understand better what I was doing this
morning because the name of the list appeared in the To field when you
reply .. :-)
But it is good only if you have a closed mailing lists because if in the
mailing list can write also person whose are not subscribed they don't
receive answers until you write their address manually...
Best Regards,
Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday"
http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco
http://www2.masternet.it
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990914213152.00980d00>