Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Nov 2005 08:41:05 -0500
From:      Parv <parv@pair.com>
To:        "J. W. Ballantine" <jwb@homer.att.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Ruby/ruby+oniguruma build failure
Message-ID:  <20051114134105.GA25117@holestein.holy.cow>
In-Reply-To: <200511141312.IAA13523@hera.homer.att.com>
References:  <200511141312.IAA13523@hera.homer.att.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <200511141312.IAA13523@hera.homer.att.com>,
wrote J. W. Ballantine thusly...
>
> 
> I'm trying to do a portupgrade on a new 6-RELEASE, and I'm getting a
> patch error on Ruby/ruby+oniguruma.  I blew away the devel/onigurmuna
> port and re-cvsup'ed on Sunday AM and I'm still getting the error.
> 
> ** Detected a package name change: ruby (lang/ruby18) -> 'ruby+oniguruma' 
> (lang/ruby18)
...
> cp -p ./enc/sjis.c   /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.3/enc/sjis.c
> patch -d /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/work/ruby-1.8.3 -p0 < ./re.c.181.patch
> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> The text leading up to this was:
> --------------------------
> |--- re.c.ruby_orig	2003-11-04 18:13:57.000000000 +0900
> |+++ re.c	2004-04-26 12:05:31.000000000 +0900
> --------------------------
> Patching file re.c using Plan A...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 483 (offset 42 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 581 (offset 40 lines).
> Hunk #3 failed at 591.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 807 (offset 110 lines).
> Hunk #5 succeeded at 811 (offset 40 lines).
> 1 out of 5 hunks failed--saving rejects to re.c.rej
> done
> *** Error code 1

I mentioned that in ...

  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=87704


You may want to open a new PR (and possibly request to close the
above as the failure reason seems to be different than that in OP).


  - Parv

-- 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051114134105.GA25117>