From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Oct 6 12:54:19 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA07027 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 12:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooter.quickweb.com (scooter.quickweb.com [199.212.134.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA07017 for ; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 12:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost) by scooter.quickweb.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA02244; Sun, 6 Oct 1996 15:49:27 -0400 Date: Sun, 6 Oct 1996 15:49:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Mark Mayo X-Sender: mark@scooter.quickweb.com To: Jake Hamby cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JDK 1.0.2 SIGSEGV?! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sat, 5 Oct 1996, Jake Hamby wrote: > Has anyone tried the FreeBSD JDK 1.0.2 that was recently posted? For some > reason, it always crashes with a SIGSEGV, and prints: > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > sig 11, code 12 or 0xc, sc 0xefbfd710, addr 0x1c > > Full thread dump: > > ... and then it hangs here ... What is crashing? javac, java, or appletviewer?? On my system, everything run just fine!! The only exception was the appletviewer, which crashed out just like you mentioned unless it was running in 8bpp or 24bpp -- so when I ran appletviewer on 32k colors, it dumped out.. I'm assuming this is your problem. Also, I had to change the scripts a little to hardwire in my CLASSPATH and substituted `arch` with i386. Otherwise, the JDK works great (I've been using it all weekend for a course!) -- many thanks to the author! I would be col, however, if the appletviewer would work in 16bpp --> then FreeBSD would be better than Sun for java developemnt :-) cya, -Mark ------------------------------------------- | Mark Mayo mark@quickweb.com | | C-Soft www.quickweb.com | ------------------------------------------- "To iterate is human, to recurse divine." - L. Peter Deutsch > GDB is useless because the binary is stripped. > ktrace is useless because no system calls are being accessed (other than > break to grab more memory). > > Has anything in -current changed since the JDK was built (I'm running > today's -current) that could cause this problem? Has anyone successfully > run the JDK? I know this package is unsupported by the author, that's why > I'm posting here. Help! > > -- Jake > >