Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:06:32 +0000 From: Stuart Henderson <stuart@internationalschool.co.uk> To: Licia <licia@o-o.org> Cc: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@u.washington.edu>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Let's nail some things down. Message-ID: <36384C38.97EABA22@internationalschool.co.uk> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981028205707.13136A-100000@o-o>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Licia wrote: > > FreeBSD Native : runs without emulation > FreeBSD Compatible : runs with emulation, no or trivial effort needed > FreeBSD Adaptible : runs with emulation, non trivial work needed By this definition, "Adaptible" could apply to pretty much anything, including most Win95 software and is therefore meaningless. Personally I'd much rather see two categories: /-FreeBSD-\ /-Works-with-\ | <tribal | | <Chuck | | Chuck | | hugging | | here?> | | Tux here?> | \--Native-/ \---FreeBSD--/ No, I'm not an artist either. :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36384C38.97EABA22>