From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 23 04:05:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0E31065679 for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 04:05:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.221.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F1D8FC0A for ; Sun, 23 May 2010 04:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk11 with SMTP id 11so4035717qyk.13 for ; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=u60R74wzDaCvA17uwPJKhH9Dp18wLpp3kG/N7qFtKMY=; b=W/hbx/CUdami6zKlWmMFVtXGTkTcDIXSC/QaQuAdbpPkTAYYt1sGxNEuRt5yfpC9a/ QMxEvZHycsYMRBmuRnzO1NiQ3bk+9OlZ4J52L3cV+xxT2FB2jwr5YCv8fCXOJI8MmXAx NHdtVjTso/UHm52cmrhmBNxhk0GVY5r5MdN50= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=raVi0Xm/ot7FWrNI+th65ajBUaYiqVbCl1q1kP+k/0s53TvXO2lZHnDqLi608sExGt /rfCYdGCk6mMslbqct+usMwqJaZv6//jaQc3aDSmnPTlP8SFh5x1rzRGWfMSGzWHqgrr yhowKwyQ+U6TJTAmJLAmCEi7g2XLaVkFieJ+g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.80.65 with SMTP id s1mr2325555qak.239.1274587541556; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.99.67 with HTTP; Sat, 22 May 2010 21:05:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9EA21187-5E9F-4E86-8B82-53EC73DD8410@lafn.org> References: <6D48A7EF-6412-4084-A334-970D3D50A013@lafn.org> <9EA21187-5E9F-4E86-8B82-53EC73DD8410@lafn.org> Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 23:05:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: atapicam issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 04:05:42 -0000 On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > Both machines were installed from the same CD over old Windows systems. > They were installed within a few days of each other. loader.conf only has > "console=comconsole". Reading through the handbook page above it indicates > that atapicam needs to be loaded in /boot/loader.conf. I'll add that to > both machines. Makes me wonder why the one worked. kldstat showed it was > not loaded. Well I assumed the hardware is identical but is it a scsi optical drive in the one worked? -- Adam Vande More