From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Jul 21 14:28:38 1995
Return-Path: chat-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id OAA25044
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:28:38 -0700
Received: from aero.org (aero.org [130.221.16.2])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA25032
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:28:33 -0700
Received: from antares.aero.org ([130.221.192.46]) by aero.org with SMTP id <111125-2>; Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:27:54 -0700
Received: from anpiel.aero.org by antares.aero.org (4.1/AMS-1.0)
	id AA14630 for kleung@frodi.cs.uop.edu; Fri, 21 Jul 95 14:27:30 PDT
To: Tiggie <kleung@frodi.cs.uop.edu>
Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Maybe this will fix some Future Domain problems 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 21 Jul 1995 12:22:10 PDT."
             <Pine.SUN.3.91.950721122033.2938B-100000@uop.cs.uop.edu> 
Date: 	Fri, 21 Jul 1995 14:27:18 -0700
From: "Mike O'Brien" <obrien@antares.aero.org>
Message-Id: <95Jul21.142754pdt.111125-2@aero.org>
Sender: chat-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> So who actual did make the better scsi controllers, Adaptec or Future
> Domain, for use with FreeBSD?  Just curious.   :)

Better controllers?  Who knows?  Better _supported_?  Adaptec.
In general the FreeBSD core group likes BusLogic a lot (except lately,
where they've gotten some grief).  I run Adaptec and it just ticks
right along.