Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 15:25:46 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: __STDC__ removal? Message-ID: <20020526222546.GD43189@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/options.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/pppd.h:#if __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ rtsold/rtsold.c:#if __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#ifdef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* defined __STDC__ */ zic/zdump.c:#ifndef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* !defined __STDC__ */ ee/ee.c:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus) ee/ee.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/ee.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#if defined(__STDC__) ee/new_curse.c:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifdef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.h:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) || defined (USG) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) lex/NEWS: - Changed to only use '\a' for __STDC__ compilers. lex/NEWS: and free() for gcc, which defines __STDC__ but (often) doesn't lex/NEWS: - Generated scanner uses prototypes and "const" for __STDC__. lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flex.skl:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#ifndef __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#define __STDC__ 1 lex/flexdef.h:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ rpcgen/rpc_hout.c: f_print(fout, "\n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n"); rpcgen/rpc_main.c: f_print(fout, "\n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n"); telnet/externs.h:# ifdef __STDC__ telnet/externs.h:# if defined(__STDC__) telnet/ring.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(LINT_ARGS) yacc/skeleton.c: "#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__", yacc/skeleton.c: "#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__", yacc/skeleton.c: "#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__", -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020526222546.GD43189>