From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jul 10 09:31:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA10277 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA10271 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.60 #1) id 0wmM7n-0000zd-00; Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:31:23 -0600 To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Subject: Re: no SYSVSHM in GENERIC now.. Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Jul 1997 09:22:21 +0200." <19970710092221.JN34121@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <19970710092221.JN34121@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199707091923.MAA02400@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 10:31:22 -0600 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <19970710092221.JN34121@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes: : MIT-SHM is an extension that must be explicitly used by the clients, : and AFAIK only few clients actually use it. Yes. That is true. However, the ones that do use it are in the "cool" category: mpeg_play and friends. So I have the option enabled on all the machines that I have that run X. Don't know if that makes sense for the whole world or GENERIC, but it makes sense for me. Warner