From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 3 05:51:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA26523 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 05:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obiwan.psinet.net.au (obiwan.psinet.net.au [203.19.28.59]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA26498 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 05:51:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adrian@localhost) by obiwan.psinet.net.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA04977; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 20:32:11 +0800 (WST) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 20:32:10 +0800 (WST) From: Adrian Chadd To: Michael Smith cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Minor linux_emul update In-Reply-To: <199706030734.RAA02671@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > Can you > > > have sysctl variables in LKMs? > > > > Last time i've been looking for it, this didn't work. IMHO, there > > should be a way for it. > > That kinda sinks the whole thing then. 8( I've tried that .. she no go. Anyone got any ideas? I'd really like the java support I wrote to have its sysctl hooks work when used as an LKM *grin* If I'm feeling espcially bored tonight I'll check out the sysctl code and see if it can support LKMs. Thing is, I remember it being the sysctl stuff defined at compile time. Don't quote me though.. I'm busy working. :) Adrian