From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:49:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC35616A4BF for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955043F85 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from b_cassidy@bellsouth.net) Received: from bellsouth.net ([68.214.80.129]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.netSMTP <20030929074859.IMFV1781.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:48:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:51:57 -0500 From: Bryan Cassidy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 4.8 v/s 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:49:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is better for whatever reasons people use it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d+SdKjx9X0nK5vwRArY5AJ44i24ywDRWdL7cWN8dQJM5RRqN3ACghAg6 VUx2SDWZiY5AU3ObTQhCtJ0= =tTb3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----