From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 10 21:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C9A16A4CF; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cablenet.lt (mail.cablenet.lt [217.147.34.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C26043D3F; Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:16:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rolnas@takas.lt) Received: from ctv-217-147-36-211.vinita.lt ([217.147.36.211] helo=rolnas.linux) by mail.cablenet.lt with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B1IUc-0000Kz-F1; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:12:26 +0200 Received: from rolnas by rolnas.linux with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B1IYG-0000Hi-00; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:16:12 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 07:16:12 +0200 From: Rolandas Naujikas To: Tim Robbins Message-ID: <20040311051612.GA1052@rolnas> References: <20040309033529.GA88800@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040309033529.GA88800@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: VU MIF Sender: Rolandas Naujikas cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using read-only NULLFS leads to panic. gdb output included, e asy to reproduce. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 05:16:14 -0000 What do you mean read-only nullfs ? Read-only mount_null with read-only target dir, or only read-only mount_null with read-write target dir ? Rolandas Naujikas On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 02:35:29PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 09:58:47AM +0100, Helge Oldach wrote: > > > Did I miss this MFC, or haven't you back-ported it yet? > > Here's the patch against RELENG_4: > http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/nullfs-4.diff > > It works, but I'm not going to commit it until I've had time to > check a few things first. > > > Tim > > ------------------------------