Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:36:24 -0400
From:      Matthew Donovan <kitche@kitchetech.com>
To:        Nikolaj Thygesen <mailinglist@diamondbox.dk>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Commiting new ports
Message-ID:  <20080605233624.GA3112@njord.Belkin>
In-Reply-To: <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk>
References:  <48486F30.1000603@diamondbox.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
>    I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently=20
> commited a new port, and received two messages from "ports." The first=20
> one noted that a person had assigned the port to himself, and the second=
=20
> mail simply stated that the PR went from "open" to "closed" due to=20
> "feedback timeout." I reckon this means the port was rejected, but have=
=20
> no clue for what reason. Was I supposed to supply any kind of feedback=20
> somewhere??
>=20
>=20
>    br - Nikolaj
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
I have put up ports that are new and have not heard anything myself but it =
sounds like they were waiting for someone to give feedback on your port.=20

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkhIeHgACgkQCyI5DJQdxQ8x8ACfU3svSXBi+mV441VLOo3S4LXZ
8IwAnAi2wp0wXEhasGOoGHCNNn1N+XbT
=kXZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080605233624.GA3112>