From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 27 23:01:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB9016A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:01:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from MX3.estpak.ee (ld3.estpak.ee [194.126.101.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A8843FBF for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-37-82-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.37.82]) by MX3.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D304438; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 08:59:49 +0200 (EET) Received: from kevad.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kevad.internal (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9S71aY3001183; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:01:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo@kevad.internal) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id h9S71Z2U001182; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:01:35 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:01:35 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Andre Guibert de Bruet Message-ID: <20031028070135.GA1147@kevad.internal> References: <20031020081944.GA40541@kevad.internal> <20031020102613.P47918@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20031020133832.GA1420@kevad.internal> <20031021152619.GA27334@kevad.internal> <20031027144431.A59546@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031027144431.A59546@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Random signals in {build,install}world recently? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 07:01:41 -0000 On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:46:03PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > I went back to last known good kernel/world combination, which is > > from September 16. The next and problematic kernel/world pair is > > from September 30. So the problem was introduced between these > > dates. > > Well, I have a system from the 25th that works just fine, we're looking > between the dates of 9/25 - 9/30. It is fixed, grab newer sources. -- Vallo Kallaste