From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 12  4:52:43 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3CB14E5B
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 04:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com)
	by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1)
	id 11EtLI-00012a-00; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:48:20 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Cc: Aaron Smith <aaron@mutex.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: New tests for test(1) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:26:41 GMT."
             <l03020902b3d86d86439c@[194.32.164.2]> 
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:48:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4003.934458500@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 12:26:41 GMT, Bob Bishop wrote:

> Further, isn't test a builtin for most (all?) shells? Sounds like a can of
> worms to me...

If your only motivation for saying it's a can of worms is that test is
usually a builtin, don't sweat it. Lots of scripts insist on using
/bin/test .

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message