From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 25 07:52:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56E1065672 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358338FC17 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5025222C50A5; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:52:25 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:52:24 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Jason Message-ID: <20100225095224.0547502a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20100225052506.GA987@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <20100225052506.GA987@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make package for ports, general question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:52:26 -0000 --Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:25:06 -0800 Jason wrote: [ .. ] > That being said, I ran into an item today that had me perplexed. >=20 > Basically, it comes down to this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/pkg-install.html >=20 > Why is it that "make package" doesn't include the execution > instructions noted in the Makefile. To me, with my new knowledge of > the ports system, seems like double the work for development and > maintaining a port and package. I'm not just speaking for someone > that maintains internal ports, but the many developers that maintain > ports in the official ports tree for FreeBSD. [ .. ] What exactly doesn't work for you? Are you talking about pkg-message? --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B --Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuGLDgACgkQJ7GIuiH/oeWtMwCfQAeKooRoEX3ioaCvgD/1Gyxp DSUAoI+xNua5QgbackBXg5bNDKPtnAgF =G+su -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/_sZi=v=L+p=OgowtjYnb1Hh--